From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66206-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC23A13877A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:16:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C5CEE0AF6;
	Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:16:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E57CE0AEB
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:16:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (vm2.randomserver.org [178.63.169.84])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: hasufell)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28DB233FE88
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:16:24 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <539C7554.4060703@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:16:20 +0000
From: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Subslots: should they be bumped like SONAME or on
 any ABI changes?
References: <20140614164151.45afb5ca@pomiot.lan>	<20140614161341.6cc4c2fa@googlemail.com>	<539C6B28.901@gentoo.org> <20140614164538.09a82da0@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140614164538.09a82da0@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: 1a1b17c9-2452-4643-b5bc-1542be6e1156
X-Archives-Hash: 9b967528114cdcd770c5059de237eeca

Ciaran McCreesh:
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:32:56 +0000
> hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh:
>>> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:41:51 +0200
>>> Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>>> However, this means that we force much more rebuilds than
>>>> necessary.
>>>
>>> This shouldn't be considered to be a problem.
>>
>> Why not?
> 
> If "not having to do lots of compiling" is your goal, you're using the
> wrong distribution.
> 

I cannot see an argument against avoiding useless rebuilds here.