From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644F41387FD for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 04:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85FA5E0AC9; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 04:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 995FDE0A83 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 04:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.111] (unknown [114.91.164.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: patrick) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D21733FD9B for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 04:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5397D83F.8070006@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 12:17:03 +0800 From: Patrick Lauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The state and future of the OpenRC project References: <20140607201920.0e0ccd5c@gentoo.org> <53937778.7020604@sporkbox.us> <20140607230815.07bc18e7@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <5393B6D8.4080201@gentoo.org> <20140608135616.581807d8@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <53947600.50506@gentoo.org> <20140608171543.45bf6ce7@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <53948A21.6020809@gentoo.org> <5396106A.4010209@gentoo.org> <53962AF6.1050500@gentoo.org> <20140610194500.2185800828ffd57eb1947614@gmail.com> <539728FB.3010305@gentoo.org> <20140610204553.7dbb98d661d265380631c6ad@gmail.com> <20140610221007.389e476c@caribou.gateway.pace.com> In-Reply-To: <20140610221007.389e476c@caribou.gateway.pace.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4dd87191-880a-4176-8baa-7df26f1197eb X-Archives-Hash: 554a91b03b2abc881a6f4195dc9cfc14 On 06/11/2014 12:10 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: >> But, for the most part we just need to get the back-end re-written to >> work with a git repo. Actually migrating the tree itself to git is >> largely a solved problem. > > Weren't we also waiting for some gpg signing stuff to land? > That's completely orthogonal (but would be convenient to have as a built-in, which git since ~1.8 does) Since people can't even decide on a key policy in under 5 years I doubt signing is important enough ... Now git has some/all of the needed features, and people wait on a future potential git migration instead of figuring out the important bits now (a good part of that is defined in GLEP 63, but there's no action apart from work on gentoo-keys.I don't have motivation to try pusing this again this year ...)