From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3DE1387FD for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:42:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5480E09E7; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:42:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE786E0891 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (107.4.189.109.customer.cdi.no [109.189.4.107]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bernalex) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D586534009F for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5396E0F8.5020302@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:42:00 +0200 From: Alexander Berntsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project References: <20140607201920.0e0ccd5c@gentoo.org> <5396106A.4010209@gentoo.org> <53962AF6.1050500@gentoo.org> <3439561.dz4noWu4c3@cschwan-laptop> In-Reply-To: <3439561.dz4noWu4c3@cschwan-laptop> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1f527e9d-eee8-4cc0-9604-3743de535267 X-Archives-Hash: 735487d0f871f7cc5b0c77e83c4fb442 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 For what it's worth, I strongly oppose using GitHub or any other SaaSS that is not licensed using AGPL or under similar terms. My suggestion is Phabricator, which additionally beats GitHub on functionality by having proper code review support. I will however not oppose any momentum for a different self-hosted free software solution. - -- Alexander bernalex@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlOW4PgACgkQRtClrXBQc7U7JQD+Lg9mKq+Y/pW9bSUDAxLkTxSP 9D2E18qGh9Ce/ZBQAXMA/RiqRN9QGtqIPGBVah3ZOXa8zV4FBP0CVqSZhNECZ6JB =mTUU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----