From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828E41381FA for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 20:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2570FE0948; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 20:19:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-f169.google.com (mail-yk0-f169.google.com [209.85.160.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 331C7E08FB for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 20:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 200so19314ykr.14 for ; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:19:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=+3+iSYinpVGb9h6EOhGFDu4bOpG1BI3wucra8Bg5eIE=; b=DI0iyhNLIyA2EExz1QdK5JSQLmjVctz6RO1QAO/9r7dy8tVaa0CwOKk8oip9XQOdqc U+C3nqwQSPcQaWNDMWEe4W7fAEjgWX+PdlelLvjQ7LGzgWuFSc+tuE3Uvhv2ZI7UriuZ oh/beeVZLmLCOGEZfWASRAmali97eQmHLYQdGJKqw9uoLSuUbrIPgaGEPZXATDTz09JJ RKDZ4kgzPGCaZsvrio+TMV7kThIWAVsORgLfs5LJZ+TdaGaWzrojmWgr4Hrl4rjbNTGV Pm6Bt6hDirKVajSkO6tW4485qv/glXDJtXivmiC5I36I7xA9AOkcLzXR2V6lpnpatQpA jESA== X-Received: by 10.236.91.48 with SMTP id g36mr27864430yhf.151.1401913191471; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:19:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-147-33.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.147.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q44sm5322576yhg.15.2014.06.04.13.19.50 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:19:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <538F7F65.9000208@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:19:49 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:28.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/28.0 SeaMonkey/2.25 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: news item for upower References: <538DED0F.8010709@gentoo.org> <1401812396.19408.4.camel@oswin.hackershack.net> <20140603185813.18588.qmail@stuge.se> <538E26F6.2000801@gentoo.org> <538E2EEB.1080309@gmail.com> <538F4828.3070701@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030100040202060700040700" X-Archives-Salt: d092d2f2-d999-4261-915a-6431c0e46d9e X-Archives-Hash: 65604a12dd27522a67867c60166f5953 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030100040202060700040700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ben Kohler wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Samuli Suominen > wrote: > > > Wrong. I'm always using the -t (--tree) flag with Portage and I > would > have seen upower being the culprit immediately, > and second command would have been `eix upower` to see available > versions, at which point I would have seen > upower-pm-utils, and figured it out. > > - Samuli > > I'm glad this fire has mostly been put out, but I think you are making > quite a leap here that normal users can "see upower-pm-utils, and > figure it out". You may be too close to this problem to understand > just how confusing it is to everyone else. > > No offense intended. > > -Ben As a user, I have ran into blockers quite a few times. I either end up asking on -user or using the trial and error approach. A lot of the time, the trial and error approach fails and I still end up posting on -user or find where someone else beat me to it. It's rare with the output that portage gives that I can figure out why something is blocking. Generally this is just a issue of a different version of the same package being needed. Given that in this case it is a entirely different package that is needed to resolve it, I certainly would have been posting on -user. Unless portage spelled it out that I needed to use a different package all together, it would have never occurred to me. I might add, I been using Gentoo since 2003. I'm not a dev for sure and don't do scripting stuff so diggin in the ebuilds doesn't generally help me much either. Just a users point of view. Dale :-) :-) --------------030100040202060700040700 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Ben Kohler wrote:

On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> wrote:

Wrong.   I'm always using the -t (--tree) flag with Portage and I would
have seen upower being the culprit immediately,
and second command would have been `eix upower` to see available
versions, at which point I would have seen
upower-pm-utils, and figured it out.

- Samuli

I'm glad this fire has mostly been put out, but I think you are making quite a leap here that normal users can "see upower-pm-utils, and figure it out".  You may be too close to this problem to understand just how confusing it is to everyone else. 

No offense intended.

-Ben

As a user, I have ran into blockers quite a few times.  I either end up asking on -user or using the trial and error approach.  A lot of the time, the trial and error approach fails and I still end up posting on -user or find where someone else beat me to it.  It's rare with the output that portage gives that I can figure out why something is blocking.  Generally this is just a issue of a different version of the same package being needed. 

Given that in this case it is a entirely different package that is needed to resolve it, I certainly would have been posting on -user.  Unless portage spelled it out that I needed to use a different package all together, it would have never occurred to me. 

I might add, I been using Gentoo since 2003.  I'm not a dev for sure and don't do scripting stuff so diggin in the ebuilds doesn't generally help me much either. 

Just a users point of view. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 

--------------030100040202060700040700--