From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D441381FA for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADBC2E095A; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E0CE089E for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.173.147.84] (85-76-37-17-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.37.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B4A133FE5F for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 13:31:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <538DCD8F.2050908@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:28:47 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release -> No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore References: <5383A0E6.3020700@gentoo.org> <20140531024701.GB3828@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <5389BA4C.8040106@gentoo.org> <2990845.EWIttsqmb4@andromeda> <538DB0C5.6070206@gentoo.org> <20140603140850.7b69dff6@gentoo.org> <538DBE76.8060300@gentoo.org> <20140603152000.256c8e2a@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20140603152000.256c8e2a@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 3ed121ae-ce4d-47fa-976c-f856ad778660 X-Archives-Hash: 0deee2e57aeb83c5057426bb6bbaab05 On 03/06/14 16:20, Tom Wijsman wrote: >> This has already hit stable. The dependency on systemd is present in >> sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3, which was just stablized. > Ehm, no, version 0.9.23-r3 controls that with a systemd USE flag; No, it doesn't. > in comparison, 0.99.0 mainly wants you to run it with systemd: "mainly", as in, since 0.99.0 removed support for hibenate/suspend in favour of systemd, the power/session managers need to integrate their own hibernate/suspend support diffently. For example, I'm using Xfce, OpenRC, UPower 0.99.0, pm-utils, Xfce 4.11+ and I have hibernate/suspend working just fine without systemd. And UPower is for much more than hibernate/suspend, it has dozens of features, so anykind of systemd dependency on 0.99.0 wouldn't make sense > > 26 May 2014; Samuli Suominen > upower-0.99.0.ebuild: This release is mainly for use with > sys-apps/systemd because upstream removed support for > sys-power/pm-utils completely from git master. The 0.9 branch is for > sys-power/pm-utils use. Adjust ebuild accordingly. > > Though I'm a bit confused why 0.99.0 doesn't list a systemd dependency; > I thought it had one, but maybe it is in another package I'm unaware of. > Outdated ChangeLog entry from March, those were the facts we dealt back then, only partly true anymore, consumers have evolved