From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63FC1381FA for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAD6CE08E0; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:26:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5935E08C1 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.173.147.84] (85-76-37-17-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.37.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EBB533F9D5 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <538DBE76.8060300@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 15:24:22 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release -> No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore References: <5383A0E6.3020700@gentoo.org> <20140531024701.GB3828@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <5389BA4C.8040106@gentoo.org> <2990845.EWIttsqmb4@andromeda> <538DB0C5.6070206@gentoo.org> <20140603140850.7b69dff6@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20140603140850.7b69dff6@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 7bd25e53-7378-4b46-9ae2-0e9101406648 X-Archives-Hash: 829e750380b23e96444068329ea4bbc0 On 03/06/14 15:08, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 07:35:42 -0400 > Rich Freeman wrote: > >> This probably could have used a news item, as the change impacts both >> stable and ~arch users. > Are we going to write a news item every time systemd acquires a new > mandatory relationship with a reverse dependency? IMHO, not every singular dependency change (even blocker) needs one. For those failing to read `eix upower` or `emerge -C upower` or masking systemd, or number of other ways the blocker can be solved, the answer is in Gentoo news letter, forums, first hits in Google, /topic of #gentoo at Freenode, MLs, pretty much everywhere. But news item has been planned all along for when UPower 0.99.0 goes stable, propably GNOME 3.12 and some 0.99.0 consumers, when there are enough steps to accumulate as news worthy. - Samuli