From: Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release -> No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 15:24:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538DBE76.8060300@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140603140850.7b69dff6@gentoo.org>
On 03/06/14 15:08, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 07:35:42 -0400
> Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> This probably could have used a news item, as the change impacts both
>> stable and ~arch users.
> Are we going to write a news item every time systemd acquires a new
> mandatory relationship with a reverse dependency?
IMHO, not every singular dependency change (even blocker) needs one.
For those failing to read `eix upower` or `emerge -C upower` or masking
systemd, or number of other ways the blocker can be solved, the answer
is in Gentoo news letter, forums, first hits in Google, /topic of #gentoo at
Freenode, MLs, pretty much everywhere.
But news item has been planned all along for when UPower 0.99.0 goes
stable, propably
GNOME 3.12 and some 0.99.0 consumers, when there are enough steps to
accumulate as news worthy.
- Samuli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-03 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-26 20:15 [gentoo-dev] UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release -> No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore Samuli Suominen
2014-05-26 20:21 ` [gentoo-dev] " Samuli Suominen
2014-05-27 5:34 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michał Górny
2014-05-27 6:57 ` Samuli Suominen
2014-05-31 2:47 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J. Long
2014-05-31 11:17 ` Samuli Suominen
2014-06-03 11:40 ` J. Roeleveld
2014-06-03 11:25 ` Samuli Suominen
2014-06-03 11:35 ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-03 12:08 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-03 12:24 ` Samuli Suominen [this message]
2014-06-03 12:52 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-03 13:04 ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-03 13:20 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-03 13:28 ` Samuli Suominen
2014-06-03 13:40 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-03 13:46 ` Samuli Suominen
2014-06-03 13:53 ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-03 14:05 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-03 14:09 ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-03 15:48 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-03 15:52 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2014-06-03 16:04 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-03 14:12 ` Samuli Suominen
2014-06-03 14:45 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2014-06-03 14:49 ` Samuli Suominen
2014-06-03 14:57 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2014-06-03 16:09 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-03 19:18 ` J. Roeleveld
2014-06-03 19:14 ` J. Roeleveld
2014-06-03 13:29 ` Rich Freeman
2014-06-03 13:41 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-03 13:26 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-06-03 14:03 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-03 23:55 ` Patrick Lauer
2014-06-04 0:24 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-04 0:44 ` Patrick Lauer
2014-06-04 6:58 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-06-04 1:20 ` Greg Woodbury
2014-06-04 8:11 ` Olav Vitters
2014-06-04 1:45 ` Off-list: " Alan McKinnon
2014-06-04 6:11 ` Duncan
2014-05-27 8:19 ` [gentoo-dev] " Alexey Shvetsov
2014-05-27 8:19 ` Alexey Shvetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538DBE76.8060300@gentoo.org \
--to=ssuominen@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox