From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F801381FA for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:11:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3758E09C0; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6D31E0933 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [94.0.11.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hwoarang) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0AE933FE6B for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <538CB048.3000004@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:11:36 +0100 From: Markos Chandras User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs References: <53269FE3.7060602@gentoo.org> <538646D5.6090601@gentoo.org> <5389013B.7080909@gentoo.org> <20140602150314.25f8057f@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <20140602150314.25f8057f@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a45dcd98-e23f-4501-8694-79e59c1e1e53 X-Archives-Hash: 9d9a0bea1e5afe4e5363f64a3d93f94a On 06/02/2014 02:03 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Fri, 30 May 2014 23:07:55 +0100 > Markos Chandras wrote: > >> On 05/28/2014 09:32 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >>> Perhaps it makes more sense to disband the herd and put all packages >>> except the ones you use up for grabs? > >> I suppose so. Let me have a look and see how many packages belong to >> that herd and then I will see what to do. > > You should maybe wait a few weeks. It wouldn't make sense to first > call on developers to join an existing structure, and to then > immediately tear it down leaving them to pick up the pieces. > > > jer > Yes definitely. I wasn't planning on doing this overnight. -- Regards, Markos Chandras