From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2A61381FA for ; Sat, 31 May 2014 20:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B42EEE087D; Sat, 31 May 2014 20:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD1D6E0875 for ; Sat, 31 May 2014 20:18:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.179.145.215] (85-76-76-251-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.76.251]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84A2433FE4C for ; Sat, 31 May 2014 20:18:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <538A38A3.8080906@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 23:16:35 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? References: <53889F70.1090404@gentoo.org> <538A319B.2010107@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1af33875-6a3e-431c-b37e-40e7d165d7f9 X-Archives-Hash: ce1b602521278b5762906866dc6e0b44 On 31/05/14 23:00, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:46:35PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> The patch in the bug is not enough. Notice >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828#c13 >> Those should be reseted to "" too. > Read what I applied, I did set it to "". > Thanks, looks good. Can we go with fast stabilizing this version?