From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D061381FA for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 17:21:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3033E0A02; Fri, 30 May 2014 17:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB30DE09DD for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 17:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (107.4.189.109.customer.cdi.no [109.189.4.107]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bernalex) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A42A233F0F9 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 17:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5388BE10.6030508@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 19:21:20 +0200 From: Alexander Berntsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? References: <53889F70.1090404@gentoo.org> <20140530181022.6b263cde@gentoo.org> <5388B301.1000401@gentoo.org> <20140530191154.382a6738@gentoo.org> <5388BC82.5060406@gentoo.org> <20140530191858.190e8980@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20140530191858.190e8980@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: cefac30f-e771-4270-95b2-ee557479fb32 X-Archives-Hash: 8bbf3a29494808978a3b97558743aa54 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 30/05/14 19:18, Tom Wijsman wrote: > Well, this thread's problem is not severe at all; thus, no need to > mask. I disagree. I'm with ssuominen. Do with that information what you will... - -- Alexander bernalex@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlOIvhAACgkQRtClrXBQc7Uo+wEAuIGuuYNG6EKwDEwWMsM5qxJQ ihZuZ0qC9VfBwdva5VABAJuq6TkYroOOHxI/ncsABDg2tyY1Q/8VSTwkqzEx9nXz =2jVG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----