From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611A41381FA for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 16:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D937E08F4; Fri, 30 May 2014 16:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BDFAE08D1 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 16:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (pool-108-39-152-11.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net [108.39.152.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: zerochaos) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FD7933F4FC for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 16:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5388B6EF.80306@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 12:50:55 -0400 From: "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone with access to genkernel repository? Or should genkernel be p.masked on amd64 profiles? References: <53889F70.1090404@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <53889F70.1090404@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c6c8020c-f3c5-4449-bfd1-84391ad68ad4 X-Archives-Hash: ea9dfca8f9435f0b3d607b0f5f0fa1e2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/30/2014 11:10 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings, > ... to genkernel repository for: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828 > > I'll p.mask it on amd64 profiles if noone replies soon :( > Please don't p.mask a working program because a config file is wrong. The arch teams think the genkernel team should be updating the kernel configs and vice-versa, so no one does it. I would be fine with entirely removing the kernel configs in genkernel, but I assure you a p.mask won't last long as it breaks releng and breaks users. I'm super happy for you that you like dracut, but gentoo officially uses genkernel and it shall not be p.masked due to an OPTIONAL config file. Thanks, Zero_Chaos -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTiLbuAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKF/8QAIGEAzU5xoMM1VU41FS9e/65 OcAAdW7wYTaXdAocwK72MenZbCk4IDitJK3dPaGH4gU/XUOImrntuecYKs+eDPg8 EbQUQoBeJg3zn31yParwq4BIicFsPczVyfb+YglkqZy3+D77t2HJmXg6DHilQyDb bPftBrMwOoohqotdvI7K7iADH+f3L6YjLcJ7ljCjMopMFUF4eBj3vcWegCX/CKYy JZHzzafSsj2eNT6m9nAcKZlxtW6a2LYMx8FHElUcBxqr9iD0ReCW58mwTqV6xBmX TubEiWCjnzWSL9PgOZSXbbWR9moFJP78E+u+okcpxvslZj4zdvPO46jimdfpIRYG dvooSYn8HQx8J8vYidCmqwrQFy87JF9xBmBqIsUF5jXYMRbF2Ce2zuSh1M9DFKZU FU8A18X8mbqaRFoJLksprBJx51pr1UlgnV8Rmqa3A2NWEHlZFc83q7wnRVyCwvm6 dTTK8iUzBCAIzujIRDsWNxza11FEAC2i2MAqzsXBvO1yFNFsNzDqlPfGG8xSJvh2 GN9tgvThu4KLChJgU9D5jtRYDFazSh8HhIC4MQWgJeSuDDbE4EzAuJTfsSmlAEfC IeDFZzcI5hUQ/y9qTdB8yU8rFgU+emwhwQTZGZbCJL/22+muNNHcL3aDcMJdEve+ wD2M2wcLLicDsalXvUJO =ABQe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----