From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750801381FA for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 07:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4600E08B1; Tue, 27 May 2014 07:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9BB7E0897 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 07:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phjr-macbookpro.local (unknown [87.205.251.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: phajdan.jr) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B019633F922 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 07:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5384388D.9080701@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 09:02:37 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Removing src_test from www-client/chromium X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7xOWUQX7BdWKE1SW2eaDS9jNkCsX9qk1d" X-Archives-Salt: 3489c48b-b3d5-4166-9fa0-42071356a6f0 X-Archives-Hash: b925de97001c1f0b979d77d50095f26b This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --7xOWUQX7BdWKE1SW2eaDS9jNkCsX9qk1d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It's more of a project-internal decision IMHO, but just wanted to get feedback from the larger community. Currently 11 out of 27 bugs assigned to chromium.g.o are related to test failures. I don't remember a single case where a test failure would point to a real bug in our package. I'm seriously considering just removing src_test to make the package more maintainable (less code, less bugs filed, can focus on things that *do* impact our users). If you decide to comment in favor of keeping src_test, please consider volunteering to help us with the bugs. Feel free to suggest solutions that fall somewhere in between - e.g. having src_test but not excluding any tests there and using RESTRICT=3Dtest, so that someone who really wants to run the tests FYI ca= n do so. Pawe=C5=82 --7xOWUQX7BdWKE1SW2eaDS9jNkCsX9qk1d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJThDiTAAoJEE8aJVXqcZkdskIQAIk9eYwx33s2bOKkifrCDY6b 1/XnCCOQ000vT1fhk2iO4FcpOy6Q5g36nypNljp3tE2B4lVMuidWmwtDDvySdLOn PYd+TPyy9qWpQDRHPcpHiD7gw7I58PonYfBq3y/Y2Hb3Wpigs/c9VXR4jkAuBhJT 6TPnGjQH1pbhXPMMQXkv+YsWQDYQlz5T3FVRnTRQwwVYi15xoXDxLvmmUpUpBQ0T bnuWyhWKq8cWe+9zjxP8smNbxbiaoTBCxO4/kb+boduoug8AdKP6CBWffBvUpJTt DyGAoNP1E9w7zHbfALgEJ8QCyRm7geYoClktPrqglcQkCs1yeoh2S33cTTeDSN+R JHUrh6RD9UkEyzNt+u0YJYEFi2bOPMhO+Irw7rlYFItAjYFHr/exxYLD6O2wGXiv UWdFNwgilTsVpbwuTqoDM8Vh2rSJSryLTm0NZPaj5DH974UNM6nKTVWWRfBIvBf5 QtuxaZMYnlyG/0uJtFmPbVZMHFOD6X6lRvq8cUORAt8WB73um/+eF0PNBcLfV+Jg tdupb1ntIZnYieS4PPBVzLKWA97niroDQf3evEu/VvGO7Ut+RzEkDI5f3jzXkQlV 7epZbdyH0RQCIVJYFCjqDUVYbDqz+CAdiJTm6+imIdr1ECHjBt0XbUfrOESTwvRs LCi7LtGsLitzxy4IJXVN =rsov -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7xOWUQX7BdWKE1SW2eaDS9jNkCsX9qk1d--