From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E437C158008 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 15:09:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1814EE08D4; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 15:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D32F5E08BB for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2023 15:09:22 +0000 (UTC) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] What happened to gcc-12.3.0? Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:09:11 +0200 Message-ID: <5365037.iZASKD2KPV@noumea> Organization: Gentoo Linux In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5069677.PYKUYFuaPT"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: f86f3c3c-8012-4342-92aa-82ac440b11b3 X-Archives-Hash: 72f1b5056188a100b2a2137e26f0c147 --nextPart5069677.PYKUYFuaPT Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; protected-headers="v1" From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] What happened to gcc-12.3.0? Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 17:09:11 +0200 Message-ID: <5365037.iZASKD2KPV@noumea> Organization: Gentoo Linux In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Am Donnerstag, 15. Juni 2023, 06:02:14 CEST schrieb Joshua Kinard: >=20 > Noticing that the ebuild for gcc-12.3.0 got dropped with little explanati= on. It is the upstream stable=20 > release. I am eyeballing #906310 as what may have triggered the drop, bu= t I find it a bit of a stretch ... This is for exactly the same reason as why we don't have glibc-2.36(-r0) or= 2.37(-r0) in the tree anymore. There's a stable upstream branch which accumulates bug and security fixes. = The only real difference is=20 naming, but I could switch to glibc-2.36_p20230615 too... =2D-=20 Andreas K. H=FCttel dilfridge@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer=20 (council, comrel, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Dilfridge --nextPart5069677.PYKUYFuaPT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE/Rnm0xsZLuTcY+rT3CsWIV7VQSoFAmSLKZcACgkQ3CsWIV7V QSqLYw/6AogIpUeOBXAjnbWj8ckG2+r41KHaQK349Ar46cdWNQ8qGWrH4Krw0ZpW nNPz+lJVhBKO8zfbTFXWVnD9wWox5UaEkisqQSl6SEDIZ9VACfEpAP7U7IB6Tsbb OwHT4P6VtSxfSo7DoTDpU2EnsE0JGlULLOuixiF7wbG2r6E/nfTc1etR9TUpTjxa RRvWqp+peSbRj2PV2XQUrYABitOZpVhhufLtUY/sSu9YHZ0gzkUevEPqyM85gI// yJFBboyMJejOMSlJ8x6nu4L4vgBM4YvEOku5CKurZZ5t2i3Bkne30hTkapVWexW3 iEexD7KuWLLxB8UCHpVh0yMMkjuIpkuF1t4n7kBW2F7bULqXdL10MNR7eg5sYP8b naltSjs0cPXf1K5yZEMKogVLuLmdo0LO4Lv+76xDxrjgu/TakZM0uY0QeVQe0QJa DOOmyNb+j7y9zLwoNa0d2BFb3Hc4tBZ4ZlJjRPdcF771U6/xP/zuBnNCussQsKha B9C7GUtBolqyPlmH7LtYtCg/kmwb0+4LobdQoyuQO4/WA3hJTE+6IM9vhH5nopSq Uq5To+tR5hfZ6+ZyTd1/fRYvbXrOQT8Nl0rMqSlPqulijQFay1UzFsrolTHOl3/V 0w5JDgoFMN3pf4wOaXsM9HtECoHJ9dHV/Lk5XaD072S5nVxcoo0= =zT6J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5069677.PYKUYFuaPT--