[gentoo-dev] Stabilization of netifrc-0.2.2, "extra testers wanted"

[gentoo-dev] Stabilization of netifrc-0.2.2, "extra testers wanted"

[Samuli Suominen]

Extra testers requested for netifrc-0.2.2 stabilization, also, if you
know a reason this shouldn't go stable, like
regression from 0.1, speak up now.

See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/507070

(I'm purposely special casing this package over others like this.)

- Samuli

[gentoo-dev] Re: Stabilization of netifrc-0.2.2, "extra testers wanted"

[Duncan]

Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 07 Apr 2014 23:08:38 +0300 as excerpted:

> Extra testers requested for netifrc-0.2.2 stabilization, also, if you
> know a reason this shouldn't go stable, like regression from 0.1, speak
> up now.
> 
> See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/507070
> 
> (I'm purposely special casing this package over others like this.)

FWIW, I have/had been running both netifrc-9999 and openrc-9999, along 
with udev-init-scripts-26-r2.  However I quite recently switched to 
systemd for booting, so while they're still installed, I'm only using 
trivial bits of openrc now, and perhaps (?) non of netifrc, tho I guess 
I'm still using udev-init-scripts.

I've seen no problems related to those packages here, either before or 
after I switched to systemd, save for the file-collisions that are the 
reason both netif and udev-init-scripts must stabilize together (as in 
the bug but not mentioned in your post.)

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman