From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58B01387FD for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 17:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D3436E0ACF; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 17:45:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E03EAE0A9F for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 17:45:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.3.7] (cpe-74-77-145-97.buffalo.res.rr.com [74.77.145.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: blueness) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7FCD33F3DB for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 17:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <533AFB6A.2000902@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 13:46:18 -0400 From: "Anthony G. Basile" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New virtuals for libudev and libgudev References: <5335EE26.1010606@gentoo.org> <53364874.9050603@gentoo.org> <53388280.4010105@gentoo.org> <53390215.80604@gentoo.org> <5339D180.2010309@gentoo.org> <533A5328.1000607@gentoo.org> <533AAFCF.9070600@gentoo.org> <20140401172803.219a51fe@gentoo.org> <533AE17C.3070605@gentoo.org> <533AF477.9020008@gentoo.org> <533AF888.3080303@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <533AF888.3080303@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e3ec1de1-2598-44da-9668-710de3212de6 X-Archives-Hash: 8cc397461850f3066443e695dda4e76c On 04/01/2014 01:34 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > So not, at any time, eudev users saw their implementation being replaced > by another by the PM. This is reassuring. If I can get reassurances that eudev and udev will proceed forward on equal footing in the tree then I will feel much better about the situation. Can I get that reassurance from you? -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail : blueness@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA