From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC02138E66 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D44FE0B3E; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F303E0A92 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (unknown [80.80.98.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pinkbyte) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A35D33FAE3 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <530BC231.8020503@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 02:05:37 +0400 From: Sergey Popov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade References: <530AD951.9020109@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <530AD951.9020109@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SsfBEavvgWIixjgpfCLH0FR3sJBdPOPhj" X-Archives-Salt: 7d4791b3-2f2b-46b0-a341-0b280ec9ef9f X-Archives-Hash: 430520c08759ed4a9ac15b48d3aea15c This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --SsfBEavvgWIixjgpfCLH0FR3sJBdPOPhj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable One question - if i have net.ifnames=3D0 in kernel cmdline and no 80-net-name-slot.rules in /etc/udev/rules.d - will everything be fine with this upgrade(of course, after checking of CONFIG_FHANDLE)? If yes, i think it should be mentioned, something like 'if you disabled persinent network interface names via kernel command line - nothing will change for you'. --=20 Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop-effects project lead Gentoo Qt project lead Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead --SsfBEavvgWIixjgpfCLH0FR3sJBdPOPhj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTC8I1AAoJECo/aRed9267uqEIAKheI+syMJD1dKkc4X/da2ph Ym8C5vjtgrq6xYJ0KKjOVS29DOK4QAgHH/kCnNxaD36pb/QCfpJp7iDcGzrRQoGR Sd186Lx0ViqQA7hJCLh0ZAJD9Y6hv9sEmp/VwcU34v5gLsZ4ydwBB5Yb/ww300JE con2uHf6eiZxmqHvPgcPYWREPmQ8FV4oyyo68NZQQgvcwBYTBZzXXyjfT+OHIavC VDdvlVuqmUU32ramCIUODQsAYYAbxqRAd3U1QhPK8NfcuJMMYiNdk6zmid3OjWBf Gb/Hm0ZOTybyp57qh11TQHC+kKNOEFaOX1tJOW6ImnZ2Zos5VtABTC8R7Ad4VOw= =UUrZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SsfBEavvgWIixjgpfCLH0FR3sJBdPOPhj--