From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220F3138E66 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D43E1E0B16; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9D07E0AE9 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.195] (CPE002401f30b73-CM001cea3ddad8.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.224.181.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2F5B33F908 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <530B76A6.2090008@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:43:18 -0500 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade References: <530AD951.9020109@gentoo.org> <530B41DE.1050708@whissi.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d3a8aea3-3cfd-41db-bdab-e1aa150a7b7c X-Archives-Hash: b363fb94952623bdd7512d809e81334a -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 24/02/14 10:55 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Thomas D. > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> not everyone is using systemd. On my systems for example, I don't >> have "/lib/systemd/" (INSTALL_MASK). >> >> The current news item draft raises question like "When the >> 'actual configuration' is in >> /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link... what will happen to >> people without systemd (and a INSTALL_MASK set)?" >> >> Would be nice if the news item and Wiki could handle upgrade path >> for systemd *and* non-systemd users... >> > > You need to remove /lib/systemd/ from INSTALL_MASK. If you don't > want unit files, mask /lib/systemd/system/ instead. > ..it'd be worth adding this little tidbit to the news item, probably... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlMLdqYACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDgIAD/W9UzdSD+Iafe3p+/g61tQESl PzCBbOK+uV1yIob3fzEBAI2zX/4sGKEjvKUhjZvLo+h/djzkhL+tD4hODYvjWOH9 =UN8P -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----