From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-64216-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3406C138247
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:46:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94204E0D2D;
	Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:46:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com (mail-la0-f47.google.com [209.85.215.47])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73D70E0BC7
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:46:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id eh20so1206371lab.34
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:46:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=hJOMYRqX1aHCnOjM0I12G5ZPWoZie/SyO170uC5u/oQ=;
        b=pNCdIAuVRiSpVpc62uPesuf+BivalE3tu9b7OapIk/KODGg8fqb3FOztXnKLs56E/v
         /0buCnDBHoxQHPTBfZrNgWlyEKo3zJVlRHyHkbxXpiBWqgvoapNI7QFN6ottSV8MBgUE
         ViLKC8IjkEMd/Ysa+RPliAtHyzsAs8gGF2T/94GUSwIRxhVcUszAG01dGYppt6jZ3r+z
         VijRVxdGljRRQ8eqq94GgXUqODMFlsjQ8F5G/+x6QCxFE96UYhxiEVpeEGr9FZz272Te
         ziZIkOG+GCBOiaihgY4mWDTaHz5WIh9QwpXFF75lmEaeD3MIO5y1xgFPy14BAC8YmdA/
         UgSQ==
X-Received: by 10.112.168.66 with SMTP id zu2mr4072862lbb.60.1389375980827;
        Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:46:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.60.64] (office.healtech.ru. [89.208.21.2])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id rb4sm3805168lbb.1.2014.01.10.09.46.19
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:46:20 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:46:18 +0400
From: Igor <lanthruster@gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <52d031ec.e48b700a.2293.ffffb513@mx.google.com>
To: "Andreas K. Huettel" <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Question, Portage QOS v2
In-Reply-To: <8864472.OZjXC1DmSv@kailua>
References: <52d02b83.4a1b980a.1e8d.ffffb56b@mx.google.com> <8864472.OZjXC1DmSv@kailua>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 4357f8d1-efb3-4e71-a76c-55a3895de49f
X-Archives-Hash: d61d7845387a4d6822f1f77d5a3496e1

Hello Andreas,

Friday, January 10, 2014, 9:20:17 PM, you wrote:


> Realistically most people haven't even read your mails (too much bla).

And one more goal - without PortageQOS you're forever stuck with
the legacy portage design.

If the team ever decides to change Portage you'll need feedback
on how the new portage works to patch it quickly in case there are
troubles. It's too risky to touch portage right now. Everyone
understands that this is a kamikaze job. 

-- 
Best regards,
 Igor                            mailto:lanthruster@gmail.com