From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1B4138247 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBB6FE0E0A; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0372E0CFD for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:26:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id z5so1259909lbh.12 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:26:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=hbOrKkTFBRkQ4ncy56W1uKMqPF1w4ZZKPoWKNuIPUdk=; b=atX/3AWlQzcsZq1AMUKEKML3OokPAuuJEXXnr45OCu4+RLwGA2gRvhepD5fiYlDe4l PhjioJ3zxDQ0WdN/LMXiB0gf8wVH5Il4upfwvOvR5sxwmJwpqyBznnChbx8v7BshZPm1 dy1d3ATIvqgz3mxP983f1pCNB0baVe6HVCkl0FDzvYKKPfehynw8edeoi+6U2gOnI2Xj OQ7WyXbm1k7kGPDvgCUOgzSACsHKIrFrUI9fIBMyR0kjV3/52w9ix8cfIDXecrorJ8KM 3G4ljFtXPPznWgJkn2XmOvZHK3nOVxNr3wAJZsjuT1jC/g6tobV9CmwvIkA8BYtlvqPb 4YTg== X-Received: by 10.112.135.102 with SMTP id pr6mr4028311lbb.43.1389374809133; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:26:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.60.64] (office.healtech.ru. [89.208.21.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h11sm3775248lbg.8.2014.01.10.09.26.47 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:26:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:26:47 +0400 From: Igor X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <52d02d58.0b1a700a.1f2e.ffffad96@mx.google.com> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Question, Portage QOS v3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------00707B01E2B9CFE2D" X-Archives-Salt: f9d020a1-e355-405c-9de3-a10f437e83ca X-Archives-Hash: 40dc3cb115623be751d5043e5c6e565c ------------00707B01E2B9CFE2D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello All, As there are more questions rose. See you can't just think of everything,= =20 what you need is an ability to improve fast :-) ---------------------------------------------- Thank you for all our feedback! In project like that I can't rush to programming it without everyone's approval. This part of the project should have been implemented with the first portage version by it's creator. But as I'm not this person I'll need the expertise of the whole community. Let's agree on following - I'll design the system in details on paper but no code will be produced at this stage. When it's ready (~ 1.5 months) I'll get back here and share the design sketches with you. Then we all review it again everyone could contribute it's own view and part and help to avoid some design problems if there are. I need an agreement on this stage from the list. If you consider PortageQOS is not necessary please vote NO. If you consider PortageQOS might have a chance and it depends on implementation say YES. Please vote. If NO there is no need to spend time even on sketches. If YES - there will be a system design ready and we could at least imagine how it might work as a whole and benefits it might bring. ------------------------------------------------------------------ BY VOTING WE MAKE NO ASSUMPTION that the PROJECT is going to be INTEGRATED= =20 in GENTOO without further approval.=20 At this stage the design will serve only as a demonstration that such=20 system could actually be implemented and used for benefits of GENTOO=20 project.=20 If community finds the design worth trying we'll push it for approval=20 and then it will be implemented. ------------------------------------------------------------------ PS No way PortageQOS will work without uniform agreement. That thing was missing from portage design from the start and now with the legacy it's either everyone is willing to give it a try or none. I don't want to push somebody to something he doesn't see purpose for. There are people here who spent lots of time on the project and it might be left as is if they don't want any change. --=20 Best regards, Igor mailto:lanthruster@gmail.com ------------00707B01E2B9CFE2D Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Question, Portage QOS v3 Hello All,

As there are more questions rose.  See you can't just think of everyth= ing, 
what you need is an ability to improve fast :-)

----------------------------------------------

Thank you for all our feedback!

In project like that I can't rush to programming it without
everyone's approval. This part of the project should have been
implemented with the first portage version by it's creator. But as
I'm not this person I'll need the expertise of the whole community.

Let's agree on following - I'll design the system in details on paper
but no code will be produced at this stage.

When it's ready (~ 1.5 months) I'll get back here and share the design
sketches with you.

Then we all review it again everyone could contribute it's own view
and part and help to avoid some design problems if there are.

I need an agreement on this stage from the list.

If you consider PortageQOS is not necessary please vote NO.
If you consider PortageQOS might have a chance and it depends on
implementation say YES.


Please vote.


If NO there is no need to spend time even on sketches.
If YES - there will be a system design ready and we could at least
imagine how it might work as a whole and benefits it might bring.


------------------------------------------------------------------

BY VOTING WE MAKE NO ASSUMPTION that the PROJECT is going to be INTEGRATED&= nbsp;
in GENTOO without further approval. 

At this stage the design will serve only as a demonstration that such =
system could actually be implemented and used for benefits of GENTOO <= br> project. 

If community finds the design worth trying we'll push it for approval =
and then it will be implemented.

------------------------------------------------------------------


PS
No way PortageQOS will work without uniform agreement. That thing
was missing from portage design from the start and now with the legacy
it's either everyone is willing to give it a try or none. I don't want
to push somebody to something he doesn't see purpose for. There are
people here who spent lots of time on the project and it might be left
as is if they don't want any change.

--=  
Best regards,
 Igor                   &= nbsp;