From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA1F138247 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A71B4E0E01; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com (mail-la0-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 675E1E0DD3 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id el20so3392952lab.23 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:19:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=s5egcQgyzZ6HR1dA0qzU9K6E3ODCXbpc6km2TlkReto=; b=YIZ5FY3+aHF+aN2Kn6YruKszdYli54+KCCyAu2g0Y73YICWTEpRtSV3/B7pCg+7ugZ o0DNNec98uuC0aGR5eDFInIRRqxNLyee1oGpgDQWUpJcjxQdyjgn9iZj8e1061JPBcpI d+9IyQtcOr8H4LEgaouUBZvbgowzwPD1teFqprT4N4Sf5iNJ0l3UZyUE5/yjacTJwIK9 TBvSXtERiWzfamUscGRRGwcC+XazWoF4eTypQX6rwLErlPueS/lmFR6s/wV7I480SnJF c1TU7f0v/mOIQQMt+zEfwZtzjBxpulO0g9CGL+Gthnrwxx72AzxpzO9AYzXTc01i98vM +LpA== X-Received: by 10.112.171.234 with SMTP id ax10mr4032491lbc.77.1389374340666; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:19:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.60.64] (office.healtech.ru. [89.208.21.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r10sm4747152lag.7.2014.01.10.09.18.59 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:18:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:18:58 +0400 From: Igor X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <52d02b83.4a1b980a.1e8d.ffffb56b@mx.google.com> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Question, Portage QOS v2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2481ff47-941e-4cc6-b5f0-4a53ab84ddfd X-Archives-Hash: 696c1f019099698f17092cf530694d3d Hello All, As there are questions at to what we vote. ---------------------------------------------- Thank you for all our feedback! In project like that I can't rush to programming it without everyone's approval. This part of the project should have been implemented with the first portage version by it's creator. But as I'm not this person I'll need the expertise of the whole community. Let's agree on following - I'll design the system in details on paper but no code will be produced at this stage. When it's ready (~ 1.5 months) I'll get back here and share the design sketches with you. Then we all review it again everyone could contribute it's own view and part and help to avoid some design problems if there are. I need an agreement on this stage from the list. If you consider PortageQOS is not necessary please vote NO. If you consider PortageQOS might have a chance and it depends on implementation say YES. Please vote. If NO there is no need to spend time even on sketches. If YES - there will be a system design ready and we could at least imagine how it might work as a whole and benefits it might bring. PS No way PortageQOS will work without uniform agreement. That thing was missing from portage design from the start and now with the legacy it's either everyone is willing to give it a try or none. I don't want to push somebody to something he doesn't see purpose for. There are people here who spent lots of time on the project and it might be left as is if they don't want any change. -- Best regards, Igor mailto:lanthruster@gmail.com