From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA48A138A1F for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CCE74E0AD5; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAB8FE0AB9 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [91.220.220.251] (pinkbyte.micronet-rostov.ru [91.220.220.251]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pinkbyte) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9A0133F835 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52EA0CFF.9050905@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:27:43 +0400 From: Sergey Popov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131113 Thunderbird/17.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] dropping redundant stable keywords References: <52E7DBC1.5020102@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <52E7DBC1.5020102@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k1xqsvI9AQ5mFtNogj7ckbme56u9hPTI2" X-Archives-Salt: 69a9dec1-ce9c-4476-803d-9fb127b05078 X-Archives-Hash: 99d4ca8dfa81c9f1398dad0cc8422cdb This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --k1xqsvI9AQ5mFtNogj7ckbme56u9hPTI2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 28.01.2014 20:33, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82= : > Here's a proposal that may address concerns from the long "rfc: > revisiting our stabilization policy" thread. >=20 > It seems at least one of the problems is that with old ebuilds being > stable on slow arches but not the more recent ebuilds, it is a > maintenance burden to keep supporting the old ebuilds even on fast > arches where it's still stable. >=20 > Why not allow maintainers to drop redundant stable and even ~arch > keywords from their packages? >=20 > Then these old ebuilds will stay with _only_ slow arch keywords. If the= y > were working back then, they will continue to work now, since there are= > not that many changes to break things as opposed to faster-moving arche= s. >=20 > What do you think? Please let me know if I should clarify this. >=20 > Pawe=C5=82 >=20 We have some discussion about stabilization practices on past QA team meeting yesterday. Please, bear with us. --=20 Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead Gentoo Qt project lead Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead --k1xqsvI9AQ5mFtNogj7ckbme56u9hPTI2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS6g0AAAoJECo/aRed9267xKYIAMLnnbOnZvrvKcqaXl1ogb/l khrvUP3AxWuFhppaBD4coToF5V5z2hxXrjZABbSIVCI6amiPAR/6NKUQ/OGzngxX m5kJ1yCW68MykoEwMKMgLPa6P27PzMIcZsNjKkPgx5/G+k/l52BbaXEsZNM2ZqEu BlEAYtm4Fl5UXZfWtDty6HMfePHnS99io95jeZtjS2+lEdU2vNJdZRhbgqruUOOZ YBqC0PXb0qKUrx4IDBSbdtJrFrMNovcixV5fV7Gc8JmiMP/rnGIATrJfNObhkoC0 PpCtmgyEDBhFc55lKgoOmq64pkJftQiNihvQN8AiS9H7uFbJa8014vDYYcU13+E= =zdEO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k1xqsvI9AQ5mFtNogj7ckbme56u9hPTI2--