28.01.2014 20:33, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." пишет:
> Here's a proposal that may address concerns from the long "rfc:
> revisiting our stabilization policy" thread.
> 
> It seems at least one of the problems is that with old ebuilds being
> stable on slow arches but not the more recent ebuilds, it is a
> maintenance burden to keep supporting the old ebuilds even on fast
> arches where it's still stable.
> 
> Why not allow maintainers to drop redundant stable and even ~arch
> keywords from their packages?
> 
> Then these old ebuilds will stay with _only_ slow arch keywords. If they
> were working back then, they will continue to work now, since there are
> not that many changes to break things as opposed to faster-moving arches.
> 
> What do you think? Please let me know if I should clarify this.
> 
> Paweł
> 

We have some discussion about stabilization practices on past QA team
meeting yesterday. Please, bear with us.

-- 
Best regards, Sergey Popov
Gentoo developer
Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead
Gentoo Qt project lead
Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead