From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96CB138247 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:39:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86CEBE0EAB; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:39:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89AA1E0E00 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.6.8] (blfd-4d0869b7.pool.mediaways.net [77.8.105.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77CF733FB0C for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52DF9FD4.4020300@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:39:16 +0100 From: hasufell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights References: <20140119050224.GA7898@laptop.home> <20140120035446.063a31be@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <52DD2E2A.2020303@gmail.com> <20140121155616.6a8cdf9b@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <52DF6C7E.8020908@gmail.com> <52DF9F20.7090406@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <52DF9F20.7090406@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d2f58638-9c4b-44ec-bedf-2bad7c58fca8 X-Archives-Hash: c473ddbeb57956955c92206c6408a11a On 01/22/2014 11:36 AM, hasufell wrote: > > > People already do that without revoking commit access, e.g. when the > recruitment project tells you they don't want to process your recruit > or when project leads don't respond to membership applications at all > or when the ComRel lead is not interested in a private discussion. > > And then they seem surprised when you get pissed. And they even seem > clueless about why the working atmosphere in the gentoo-dev community > is pretty bad. It is not, because someone has a strong opinion. > Everyone has, at times. It's about that attitude of telling people > that you are not good enough for their time. > > So this is already happening. The proposal here is just a "logical" > consequence to this situation. > sorry for messing up that mail, it was a reply to On 01/22/2014 08:00 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:> I don't want to appear rude, but when reading this entire mail all I see > > Do you realise the message that is sent by denying someone access? You > are saying that person is not good enough to work on Gentoo. Do you > really want to send that message?