From: hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:39:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DF9FD4.4020300@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52DF9F20.7090406@gentoo.org>
On 01/22/2014 11:36 AM, hasufell wrote:
>
>
> People already do that without revoking commit access, e.g. when the
> recruitment project tells you they don't want to process your recruit
> or when project leads don't respond to membership applications at all
> or when the ComRel lead is not interested in a private discussion.
>
> And then they seem surprised when you get pissed. And they even seem
> clueless about why the working atmosphere in the gentoo-dev community
> is pretty bad. It is not, because someone has a strong opinion.
> Everyone has, at times. It's about that attitude of telling people
> that you are not good enough for their time.
>
> So this is already happening. The proposal here is just a "logical"
> consequence to this situation.
>
sorry for messing up that mail, it was a reply to
On 01/22/2014 08:00 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:> I don't want to appear
rude, but when reading this entire mail all I see
>
> Do you realise the message that is sent by denying someone access? You
> are saying that person is not good enough to work on Gentoo. Do you
> really want to send that message?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-22 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-19 5:02 [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights William Hubbs
2014-01-19 5:07 ` William Hubbs
2014-01-19 5:17 ` [gentoo-dev] " W. Trevor King
2014-01-19 12:46 ` [gentoo-dev] " hasufell
2014-01-20 1:05 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-19 20:22 ` Denis Dupeyron
2014-01-20 1:01 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-20 1:22 ` Denis Dupeyron
2014-01-20 2:47 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-22 16:30 ` Jeroen Roovers
2014-01-20 1:24 ` Alec Warner
2014-01-20 2:54 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-20 13:59 ` Rich Freeman
2014-01-20 14:09 ` Alan McKinnon
2014-01-21 0:22 ` Patrick Lauer
2014-01-21 0:46 ` Rich Freeman
2014-01-21 5:29 ` Alec Warner
2014-01-21 5:27 ` Alec Warner
2014-01-22 17:54 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2014-01-22 22:37 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-01-22 22:59 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 14:56 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 15:47 ` Rich Freeman
2014-01-21 17:26 ` William Hubbs
2014-01-21 17:50 ` Rich Freeman
2014-01-21 17:56 ` Peter Stuge
2014-01-21 18:11 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 18:16 ` Peter Stuge
2014-01-21 19:18 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 21:03 ` Thomas Sachau
2014-01-21 22:56 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 23:14 ` William Hubbs
2014-01-22 7:00 ` Alan McKinnon
2014-01-22 10:36 ` hasufell
2014-01-22 10:39 ` hasufell [this message]
2014-01-22 10:58 ` Alec Warner
2014-01-22 23:29 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-22 12:34 ` Patrick Lauer
2014-01-22 19:42 ` Rich Freeman
2014-01-22 23:40 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-22 22:06 ` Alan McKinnon
2014-01-22 23:15 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-21 23:20 ` hasufell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52DF9FD4.4020300@gentoo.org \
--to=hasufell@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox