15.01.2014 21:04, Tom Wijsman пишет: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:40:20 +0400 > Sergey Popov wrote: > >> As i said earlier for similar proposals - the one option that i see >> here to make all things going better - to recruit more people in arch >> teams/arch testers. Other options lead us to nowhere, when stable >> will be eliminated or transformed into fake. > > If eventually our existing approach yields no or worsening results, it > would leads us nowhere as well; we can pick that option a few times, > but if it doesn't improve anything we'll need to start reconsidering. > It can not go to no result, unless we have no breakages in stable, stable REMAINS stable. If it contains old, but working software - then it is stable. As i said earlier, problem begins when we NEED to stabilize something to prevent breakages and arch teams are slow. -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead Gentoo Qt project lead Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead