From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B045138247 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9577DE0B43; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A37A6E0B38 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [91.220.220.251] (pinkbyte.micronet-rostov.ru [91.220.220.251]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pinkbyte) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D8CF33F195 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52D67208.1070103@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:33:28 +0400 From: Sergey Popov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131113 Thunderbird/17.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy References: <20140114213719.GA2684@laptop.home> <52D5B2CA.5030407@gentoo.org> <20140114223312.GA3337@laptop.home> <52D5BDAD.4030808@gentoo.org> <20140114231113.GA3393@laptop.home> <52D5DAB6.1000609@gentoo.org> <20140115020802.700b1568@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <52D5E03C.3010900@gentoo.org> <20140115022337.4336618d@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <52D5E60A.80600@gentoo.org> <20140115020934.GA3886@laptop.home> <20140115034209.73125eb3@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: <20140115034209.73125eb3@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jHRD9tI1CjOqsOnLiRDOF1xFw3FwN53el" X-Archives-Salt: e3e5edec-5749-401c-9b50-cde6ceff86d2 X-Archives-Hash: f35db641923b170753064cd02bad95a1 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --jHRD9tI1CjOqsOnLiRDOF1xFw3FwN53el Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 15.01.2014 06:42, Tom Wijsman =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > And for that occasional mis-guess, *boohoo*, the user can just file a > bug; which ironically even happens occasionally for stable packages. If we blindly approves increasing of such mis-guesses, then our QA level in arch teams will down below the apropriate level IMO. And this is not good first of all for our stable users. --=20 Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead Gentoo Qt project lead Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead --jHRD9tI1CjOqsOnLiRDOF1xFw3FwN53el Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS1nIJAAoJECo/aRed9267/7sH/2MYLZ43B8XavxbdWr6OMr13 jLUuYofquh4Mn+8FOQKKiPK1wqN1MulKftmDJ4b7fUiuKwjjOkUQ6btSYXM4DETo wRayZC1FdV6A9wJGSQlapB6TAoM+TuXTcFxuzsmEjgePgAcdtWMzYICufzKWVfGX AfFiE8DXb1h5inrX0ap7Mw/Jz6eACUegm4YkKpFhEAfkLBHYkK7sNpi1TtXA74Po SxvqwoZq+JLaglCb4oDSlp83THRTDvoeCTzdscb6vXOmV+eaJlqFBEedZXf7mK+U quWOhnLadhpwEluZ0ndwD0YBU9zMn1l9X2nmtVXObjJaVxFhs0n1U5gLbci2I3U= =uaOq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jHRD9tI1CjOqsOnLiRDOF1xFw3FwN53el--