From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AAE138247 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:24:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5DE0E0B23; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9A54E0B1D for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:24:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [91.220.220.251] (pinkbyte.micronet-rostov.ru [91.220.220.251]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pinkbyte) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49A1833F6A9 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52D66FD8.2000103@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:24:08 +0400 From: Sergey Popov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131113 Thunderbird/17.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy References: <20140114213719.GA2684@laptop.home> In-Reply-To: <20140114213719.GA2684@laptop.home> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nQUV4WJ8opjE05uiALavAp6kHQwUxjDnh" X-Archives-Salt: 777bf1e4-8d2b-4036-9dbf-2014866b95da X-Archives-Hash: 1246dd8fabe44e7e7ecf59ecf029af3e This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --nQUV4WJ8opjE05uiALavAp6kHQwUxjDnh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 15.01.2014 01:37, William Hubbs =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > I want comments wrt two ideas: >=20 > 1. I think maintainers should be able to stabilize their packages on ar= ch's > they have access to. I think this is allowed by some arch teams, but I > think it would be good to formalize it. >=20 > 2. I would like to see the policy below applied to all arch's [2]. >=20 > Thoughts? >=20 > William >=20 > [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/487332 > [2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20130917-summary= =2Etxt >=20 amd64 and x86 arch teams have agreement, that maintainers can stabilize their packages if they know how to properly test them. --=20 Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead Gentoo Qt project lead Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead --nQUV4WJ8opjE05uiALavAp6kHQwUxjDnh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS1m/ZAAoJECo/aRed9267vdwH/2sOQrhwTQ5/H6a1FIKzbN/v sbB/li8Fp1AhXWt5PBw58p/SYNkcvVIHk3XMVmoyNwFXpU+rx7U85RxY+xdgISo9 huwGexVzRjouR/dJyF91bsqT6FB0yf8xKOF0TuawtuUKYbaCCbn/rSxh35i7KFRs XXv57v9coH5CA/lxHqZZMZLLIAeewLvhAA54EyvmGQidVZkSwTCB0AYIW9bV/Yhu If+iNrVdAz6i/uiCBnBPLo3TUrATdE9Y0kIsKQhJzwJ4DcVVg8qIvt6TJa+om6yq rety/bI8RR77OccJYMvutPGBN+XZgvlDfa1xMZrGtirtNlXOXA6hyTHAnplCA0M= =ToOS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nQUV4WJ8opjE05uiALavAp6kHQwUxjDnh--