From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0842138247 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:17:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5472BE09F9; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61221E09B7 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.3.7] (cpe-74-77-145-97.buffalo.res.rr.com [74.77.145.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: blueness) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52DAC33F386 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52D5D39F.2000000@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:17:35 -0500 From: "Anthony G. Basile" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy References: <20140114213719.GA2684@laptop.home> <20140115004928.1fae6bf9@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <201401150106.20742.dilfridge@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201401150106.20742.dilfridge@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 11a380ed-7bf1-43f7-b69b-1fa66b60162c X-Archives-Hash: d1f8a364c84c338a65f34f3c98b90b1a On 01/14/2014 07:06 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 15. Januar 2014, 00:49:28 schrieb Tom Wijsman: >> On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:37:19 -0600 >> >> William Hubbs wrote: >>> Thoughts? >> In this situation, I see three opposite ends of choices: >> > Here's another idea: > > 4. Friendly ask the arch teams / make a policy that @system packages come > first. > > (maybe these stable requests could be marked "major" in bugzilla then?) > > Actually that's a very good idea. In fact, since those are the critical packages we can have the arch teams focus on them, and allow more relax policies of stabilization on less critical packages. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail : blueness@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA