From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5650138247 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65290E0A68; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DDA1E09FE for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.145] (CPE002401f30b73-CM001cea3ddad8.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.224.181.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68A0D33FAA9 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52D3FE8D.6010603@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:56:13 -0500 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [OT] pkgcore bikeshed (was Portage team) References: <1388986435.17870.49.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> <1389582464.7103.185.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> <20140113083917.5427344.53422.41690@pathscale.com> <52D3A71F.9040602@plaimi.net> <52D3AEB9.7080500@pathscale.com> <20140113154659.726ee662@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: <20140113154659.726ee662@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 8cc4c33e-cc54-4da0-8312-ac31a50fdf0a X-Archives-Hash: cb6ed16db825d07d1b51829b09fbce73 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 13/01/14 09:46 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:15:37 +0700 "C. Bergström" > wrote: > >> Long term the API to pkgcore could be beneficial, but again I'm >> not sure it's a game changer for users. > > Long term, we should have an independent API backend that tools > can query; not rewrite our tools every time users want to use them > with a different package manager. ..you mean, define the API and include it in PMS? how much bureaucracy will that need to occur? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlLT/o0ACgkQ2ugaI38ACPBIlwD/UhmM7jiu0c3kbczm/p0eA0nE QklKzRWkYxLpUpWEwegA/0GzTsFmUL/9C+xVvh1rpKjk23L6LAR/mWuiB34Vmnb0 =vpX0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----