From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2311387B1 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 20:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8491EE0D58; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 20:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97B6CE0C99 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 20:23:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [90.208.111.208]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hwoarang) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BE5133F2B1 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 20:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52CF0520.3050700@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 20:22:56 +0000 From: Markos Chandras User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status References: <1386598800.12112.7.camel@belkin5> <52A636D9.7050904@gentoo.org> <201401091521.00050.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201401091521.00050.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: b301ada0-5e52-4fe5-8877-605094d2eb82 X-Archives-Hash: a63115cc02ca304a44ab2b7c23e0b313 On 01/09/2014 08:20 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 09 December 2013 16:32:09 Markos Chandras wrote: >> On 12/09/2013 02:21 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> Is pam team still active? I wonder about this as, recently, we have >>>> needed to go ahead and fix some bugs related, for example, with pambase >>>> and pam_ssh >>>> >>>> Thanks for the info :) >> >> So I guess it's time to call for maintainers or we should consider >> merging this herd with another one (base?) to avoid unattended bugs for >> a long time. > > well, the sep herd was kind of by design ... i didn't want it cluttering up > base-system@ and it is super convenient to abdicate all PAM decisions to a > single herd. > -mike > I understand that but if nobody is tracking pam@ then what's the point? -- Regards, Markos Chandras