From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365F2138247 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B378E09E5; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A392E09A5 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.5] (blfd-4d0823c3.pool.mediaWays.net [77.8.35.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25EF133F60B for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52BC2F54.2060605@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:29:56 +0100 From: hasufell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/umurmur: metadata.xml ChangeLog References: <20131225095020.A91BE2004C@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <52BACEE8.1010006@gentoo.org> <52BADA97.8010600@gentoo.org> <52BC2E30.9080006@gentoo.org> <20131226132724.6b9477af@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20131226132724.6b9477af@googlemail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 3ca76927-bfb8-4304-b220-405e651b627d X-Archives-Hash: 7337057541932d86f78e33de5d7c7a41 On 12/26/2013 02:27 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:25:04 +0100 > hasufell wrote: >> That is funny that you mention "cleaning up". I remember last time >> when you broke 8 ebuilds at once because you just trusted your >> outdated repoman warning to be correct. You didn't even file a BUG >> for me, you did not contact me and after I told you that it was wrong >> and that you should revert it, you didn't. >> >> That's what I call "ignoring the rest". You do not communicate, you do >> not file bugs, you just go and do stuff. > > That kind of behaviour is what the QA team is supposed to be able to > address. You should raise this issue with them rather than accusing > each other on the lists. > He is in the QA team. And I don't find it worthwhile doing that thing. I prefer to contact people directly but it seems that did not work out very well.