From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A1A138247 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:25:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60561E099F; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:25:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75C3FE0949 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.5] (blfd-4d0823c3.pool.mediaWays.net [77.8.35.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hasufell) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F96533E94D for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52BC2E30.9080006@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:25:04 +0100 From: hasufell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/umurmur: metadata.xml ChangeLog References: <20131225095020.A91BE2004C@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <52BACEE8.1010006@gentoo.org> <52BADA97.8010600@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <52BADA97.8010600@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 135bdf4a-d8eb-4d66-b851-f44cb15e0567 X-Archives-Hash: 2f8c9df8e758a7150a5837dbeb2e3f20 On 12/25/2013 02:16 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > >> >> You are interfering with my workflow and I already told you why I kept >> the useflag, so stop reverting my commits after I told you the reasons >> in a private mail. > > Eh, it's been two days, and the temporary issue is still there ... > > Fix your workflow not to rely on repoman warnings being nonfatal, then I > won't have any reason to annoy you. > > (And I thought that was a one-time oopsie, not an issue that'll appear > more often) > >> QA is more than just running repoman and doing random commits on other >> peoples ebuilds. > > Being a dev is more than just doing your thing and ignoring the rest. > I'm getting tired of cleaning up behind people (not only you, it's on > average 2 issues a day I have to figure out and either fix or file > bugs). Don't expect any lenience or tolerance as long as the average is > that bad, I just prune the list of repoman warnings and errors down as > far as possible. > > (Today alone I filed 4 bugs for gnome [incomplete gnome-3.6 removal], > had to clean up after a stabilization bug [cups-filters], fixed a ruby > package that had now unsatisfiable ruby_targets [fxruby] ... and maybe > I've even forgotten a thing or two there. See how you adding random > spurious warnings is not improving my mood? ;) ) > > Have a nice pagan ritual day, > That is funny that you mention "cleaning up". I remember last time when you broke 8 ebuilds at once because you just trusted your outdated repoman warning to be correct. You didn't even file a BUG for me, you did not contact me and after I told you that it was wrong and that you should revert it, you didn't. That's what I call "ignoring the rest". You do not communicate, you do not file bugs, you just go and do stuff.