From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F757138247 for ; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 13:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB5E3E0ACC; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 13:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF5BCE0A9B for ; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 13:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.90] (frnk-5f741f27.pool.mediaWays.net [95.116.31.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: patrick) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B2DA33F12F for ; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 13:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52BADA97.8010600@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 14:16:07 +0100 From: Patrick Lauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/umurmur: metadata.xml ChangeLog References: <20131225095020.A91BE2004C@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <52BACEE8.1010006@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <52BACEE8.1010006@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 477b10f1-fb5b-4c3f-8927-c452f02bc9fe X-Archives-Hash: 42a45df8db9286e237090b37305b66b1 > > You are interfering with my workflow and I already told you why I kept > the useflag, so stop reverting my commits after I told you the reasons > in a private mail. Eh, it's been two days, and the temporary issue is still there ... Fix your workflow not to rely on repoman warnings being nonfatal, then I won't have any reason to annoy you. (And I thought that was a one-time oopsie, not an issue that'll appear more often) > QA is more than just running repoman and doing random commits on other > peoples ebuilds. Being a dev is more than just doing your thing and ignoring the rest. I'm getting tired of cleaning up behind people (not only you, it's on average 2 issues a day I have to figure out and either fix or file bugs). Don't expect any lenience or tolerance as long as the average is that bad, I just prune the list of repoman warnings and errors down as far as possible. (Today alone I filed 4 bugs for gnome [incomplete gnome-3.6 removal], had to clean up after a stabilization bug [cups-filters], fixed a ruby package that had now unsatisfiable ruby_targets [fxruby] ... and maybe I've even forgotten a thing or two there. See how you adding random spurious warnings is not improving my mood? ;) ) Have a nice pagan ritual day, Patrick