From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308CB13827E for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:32:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 17224E0AA2; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 313C8E0A9D for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.185.113.183] (85-76-176-177-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.176.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB44B33F498 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52AAFE33.8060206@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:31:47 +0200 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC References: <20131211204110.GA30092@linux1> <52A9DA57.6070700@plaimi.net> In-Reply-To: <52A9DA57.6070700@plaimi.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2f39159e-eacf-4208-b3ba-cb838d98f517 X-Archives-Hash: 650f03de41d1b23259e735b2fa99494e On 12/12/13 17:46, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > On 11/12/13 21:41, William Hubbs wrote: > > My thought is to rename our "rc" to "openrc", since that would be > > unique. > orc is shorter and more punny (nice excuse for designing an orcish cow > mascot). > orc is dev-lang/orc, with binaries like orc-bugreport > On 11/12/13 22:04, William Hubbs wrote:> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at > 10:47:49PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > >> are you going to rename also rc-service and rc-update? > > > No, there isn't a need for that, just "rc". > Please rename all of them, to provide uniform naming. This way, typing > orc, and tab-tabing in BASH will give you a list of orc-related > executables, just like with rc now. > as said, with tab completion, orc-* would just get mixed up with binaries from dev-lang/orc