From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EAAD13827E for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A3EFE0A88; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.plaimi.net (107.4.189.109.customer.cdi.no [109.189.4.107]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 344E1E0A6D for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.plaimi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19DFF40800 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:46:24 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=plaimi.net; s=leet; t=1386863184; bh=g8nonZadDGq4qLL5kQnR8JaxeQpprwkOL1JIJJn+J00=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=iYzb2x/is9fL4+YtJMvRPwobRDxvExkq65BHWqGNBzL4FCcYpzlgOEkYWnV0+Pr29 iij7BgRNjGRXC3W4iJCJ5VlO6CP1F78vQK9VrT4H1+lLttM7ER8K4WplWPsp+nv3Ba NtT8GACVexiBnVzsysAFaVACW0+LPxukcIdk+LlU= Message-ID: <52A9DA57.6070700@plaimi.net> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:46:31 +0100 From: Alexander Berntsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC References: <20131211204110.GA30092@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20131211204110.GA30092@linux1> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 69853d18-f47b-4e6c-8175-d264ae3b4db8 X-Archives-Hash: 340193827ed6767eda2603c2330ed8ee -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 11/12/13 21:41, William Hubbs wrote: > My thought is to rename our "rc" to "openrc", since that would be > unique. orc is shorter and more punny (nice excuse for designing an orcish cow mascot). On 11/12/13 22:04, William Hubbs wrote:> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:47:49PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: >> are you going to rename also rc-service and rc-update? > > No, there isn't a need for that, just "rc". Please rename all of them, to provide uniform naming. This way, typing orc, and tab-tabing in BASH will give you a list of orc-related executables, just like with rc now. - -- Alexander alexander@plaimi.net http://plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlKp2lcACgkQRtClrXBQc7XnwgEAsA4Z7Zgw351tyP9QfbVqOPK6 KYXCvKXqqJGpcDKvgRIA/jbIWS10BR/7a/kmeOUIeo50qOU4GehQ7PwKWHzI4tUS =SLXN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----