From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-63832-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7C513827E
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:21:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1766FE0B2A;
	Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:21:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DA40E09E5
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:21:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [94.6.147.80])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: hwoarang)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF4A033F3A8
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:20:59 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <52A8C91B.4010500@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:20:43 +0000
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook?
References: <1386708905.1931.2.camel@belkin5>
In-Reply-To: <1386708905.1931.2.camel@belkin5>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: bc9b0c80-238d-4bd8-98e3-9cb18fd1a427
X-Archives-Hash: 01ea69d48e23bd38838290704fa2a254

On 12/10/2013 08:55 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197625#c14
> 
> This has reminded me that maybe we should switch to cronie from
> vixie-cron as default and recommended cron provider in Handbook. Last
> time I checked, vixie-cron upstream was died while cronie forked it
> fixing some bugs :/
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> 
> 
> 

If vixie-cron upstream is dead as you say, then I agree we should move
away from it.

-- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras