From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CA513827E for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C931EE0BB9; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D39D3E0B5A for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-68-49-223-78.hsd1.md.comcast.net [68.49.223.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mjo) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02A7E33F195 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52A8BC3F.3020905@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:25:51 -0500 From: Michael Orlitzky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? References: <1386708905.1931.2.camel@belkin5> <0afb01cef617$3d667a90$b8336fb0$@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <0afb01cef617$3d667a90$b8336fb0$@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ab747134-3729-4a4d-ac50-cf81f4fb7e87 X-Archives-Hash: e9f713b2a82b31fcd2b7cb152573d240 On 12/10/2013 09:18 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote: > > I'd say go one step further and get rid of vixie-cron completely, is > there anything it does that cronie can't do as well or better? Is cronie a drop-in replacement, or do I have to do some thinking when replacing vixie-cron?