From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D53813827E for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 21:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22725E0B7F; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 21:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33B76E0B5F for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 21:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [94.6.147.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hwoarang) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 021A533EFCC for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 21:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52A636D9.7050904@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 21:32:09 +0000 From: Markos Chandras User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About pam herd status References: <1386598800.12112.7.camel@belkin5> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: a6629312-7422-4a50-ad9a-e926bb74293b X-Archives-Hash: e73483021ef4ee35bbea2344b24cd71b On 12/09/2013 02:21 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > I stopped caring about pambase when people decided to break it. > > I'm still officially pam herd as maintainer of Linux-PAM, pam_ssh I don't > use and care very little about. > > > Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes > flameeyes@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >> Hello >> >> Is pam team still active? I wonder about this as, recently, we have >> needed to go ahead and fix some bugs related, for example, with pambase >> and pam_ssh >> >> Thanks for the info :) >> >> > So I guess it's time to call for maintainers or we should consider merging this herd with another one (base?) to avoid unattended bugs for a long time. -- Regards, Markos Chandras