From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9D2138247 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C16A4E09E4; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:02:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC1FE09DB for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.177.8.171] (85-76-76-234-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.76.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3942933F603 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 17:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52A0B169.90507@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 19:01:29 +0200 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up References: <20131201102015.GA1219@egeo> <20131202202845.GA8574@linux1> <529CF973.2020008@gentoo.org> <529CFAA1.7080608@gentoo.org> <20131203211130.GA31972@linux1> <529F5C6C.7060704@gentoo.org> <20131204212537.GA19609@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20131204212537.GA19609@linux1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5e58f2f9-2a45-47a8-9cbc-1460aea79f74 X-Archives-Hash: 9c2aa0ab0a16d5e390376e4b683f4cb5 On 04/12/13 23:25, William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:46:36PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> seems like a virtual that wouldn't do anything useful except pull in >> random package(s) a la binary-distribution style > What about the stages? Don't we need some form of net support in > stage 3? > > William > nope. it would fall into same category with 'emerge dhcpcd' like in the handbook.