From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0157138247 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 21:10:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1953E0ACB; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 21:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BFEAE09C4 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 21:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.160] (CPE002401f30b73-CM001cea3ddad8.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.224.181.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: axs) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17BD033F187 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 21:10:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <527C01C2.8080906@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 16:10:26 -0500 From: Ian Stakenvicius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131005 Thunderbird/17.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: support the Dev team with system resources References: <527AA26B.5070907@politeia.in> <527ACE3B.7020105@politeia.in> <86siv8julw.fsf@moguhome00.in.awa.tohoku.ac.jp> <527B8410.6050507@politeia.in> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5746d659-a712-4cdd-9234-27eae29efba9 X-Archives-Hash: 5da870af69c465af687a9a48211770a6 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 07/11/13 09:20 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Denis M. wrote: >> Almost every Gentoo dev that does software testings of some sorts >> could benefit from these "build farms" (although I'd refrain from >> using that term ;) ..). > > Don't let me put a damper on your plans as-is, but I'd be > interested if developers who frequently perform these kinds of > tasks post about what they're actually doing. > > Rather than just asking people to give random others ssh access to > random boxes, it might make sense to streamline certain tasks. > Imagine a tool that takes in a list of atoms and dumps a tarball > of build logs in some standard layout. That could be easily > distributed (assuming packages were reasonably independent), and > tools like tatt might even be adapted. > > Not a reason to delay what you propose, just another opportunity. > I guess nobody wants to try and setup a VM-image-based heterogeneous grid system, huh? :) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlJ8AcIACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCqHwEAulNSjBvU4WsLu91zChM8esBf M7FWlAdM++LUsfZ0y/cA/3oZp4+7mjeWbJdUlNxtAGBDYYxD9WfNzpitwX0IFWnN =q61v -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----