From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3069D1381F3 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E37BE0AA4; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:17:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CAF0E09F1 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [94.6.147.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hwoarang) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA1F133EE6C for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52657D71.4080009@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 20:16:01 +0100 From: Markos Chandras User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [Bug 488318] media-video/mpv[luajit] - Keyword request on alpha, arm, ppc, ppc64, sparc References: <20131019190144.7858709c@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20131019194329.41f538b0@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <5263ADEC.9000000@gentoo.org> <5263B32F.1080302@gentoo.org> <5263C14E.8020709@gentoo.org> <20131021153210.5ffdf4c3@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <20131021153210.5ffdf4c3@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b0709b89-0ae9-490f-af05-997c0fcc454b X-Archives-Hash: bac6f8fe5366f97b7c4687005fdca83e On 10/21/2013 02:32 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:41:02 +0100 > Markos Chandras wrote: > >> No I never meant broken depgraphs. Well for broken deps, repoman does >> not let you commit. If you use --force to workaround broken deps, >> well, then you get what you deserve. > > No, apparently tomwij can get not only away with this (and apparently > others as well on a regular basis). Not just that: he gets to write a > lengthy "apology" that merely blames others / documentation / common > sense, and then proceeds to call me "unprofessional" for pointing out > in public the several mistakes he made. I feel very much that he's not > getting it (what he deserves). > > > jer > Lets calm down a little bit. Our documentation is nowhere near perfect and common sense is not always obvious (we have hundreds of people claiming that the opposite). Instead of arguing in public how about we contribute some patches in devmanual to avoid similar problems in the future? -- Regards, Markos Chandras