From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74A61381F3 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 14:41:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E75BEE0C94; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 14:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B907E0C8D for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 14:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [94.6.147.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hwoarang) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A78E533EDED for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 14:41:39 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5263EB44.8060301@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 15:40:04 +0100 From: Markos Chandras User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] official games repository References: <5263C7F9.9080300@gentoo.org> <20131020141538.1cfd7b3d@gentoo.org> <5263C9C6.6010709@gentoo.org> <105901382271553@web25h.yandex.ru> <5263CB10.9020908@gentoo.org> <113051382272012@web25h.yandex.ru> <5263E4F1.10804@gentoo.org> <5263E953.4030400@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <5263E953.4030400@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 772e5793-ba21-40de-a79a-9e8f2a6d37ce X-Archives-Hash: 01564cd2ad28f455a74ebbd05805c0dc On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote: > On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: >> On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote: >>>> * not related to the games team * no review whatsoever from any >>>> dev on ebuilds that get pushed there >>> >>> It is easy-fixable. It is enough to gentoo-games team to back to >>> work on it together with community. >>> >>>> * low quality >>> low quality of what? ebuilds? I bet, it is many lower-quality >>> ebuilds in the tree. Or do you mean low quality of something >>> else? Anyway, it is fixable too. Just let's start work on it. >>> >> I agree. > >> It's better to work with the user community and join efforts than >> having yet-another-shiny overlay. > > > Gamerlay is not related to the games team and this thread is not about > gamerlay which is a project that has failed. > I have zero interest to work on gamerlay. It would have to start with > removing direct commit access of users. This is not a great way to invite more users to participate. If you intend to make the game overlay and team a developer-only thing you are doing a great work. > > This is a question directed to the games team to revive their overlay > and improve workflow (e.g. I have some games ebuilds myself which are > still very experimental/alpha in my personal overlay... I'd migrate > them there). Then you shouldn't have CC'd the gentoo-dev if you are not interested in oppinion of the community -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang