From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67F91381F3 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6676AE0BFE; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FDD4E0BF9 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [94.6.147.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hwoarang) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6974C33F02B for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5263ADEC.9000000@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 11:18:20 +0100 From: Markos Chandras User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [Bug 488318] media-video/mpv[luajit] - Keyword request on alpha, arm, ppc, ppc64, sparc References: <20131019190144.7858709c@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20131019194329.41f538b0@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: <20131019194329.41f538b0@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9f17a339-5869-43fa-90d9-d9d7f5324843 X-Archives-Hash: cd4d9ae7e94fbe8c2ba60caa667e07d5 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 10/19/2013 06:43 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Sat, 19 Oct 2013 19:01:44 +0200 Jeroen Roovers > wrote: >> >> As it has been discussed on this mailing list endlessly, there >> already is a consensus: >> >> 1a) you drop the affected keywords, unless 1b) this causes you to >> drop (many) more keywords on revdeps, in which case you can >> package.(use.)mask the relevant bits 2) you inform the affected >> arch teams > > Please provide a reference to this consensus. It's probably best to document it somewhere then... > > P.S.: It is interesting to see the effects of AutoRepoman beating > people to filing bugs, maybe I should write AutoNotifyman as a > response to not having the chance to file the bug in a reasonable > time frame. > The AutoRepoman script is there just for convenience. You shouldn't take it too seriously and go filing bugs like crazy. The affected packages can slowly be fixed. It's not like they are totally broken but it's more like of another way to tell you that a few QA problems exist and that it would be nice to fix them whenever you find some time. - -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJSY63sXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzNTVDNDczOUYzRjJEMTRGNDRGMzU2RkMw OUJGNEY1NEMyQkE3RjNDAAoJEAm/T1TCun88Mv0P/31GkGTmWbtJy11g1bA+Xtdp 8g5eRP9S3Xj9kXjkKMczCqP5U2T5lgavMqnIDytLJehK9BxkbyDfUHqWkFmTvLAa hGrD/ioVG3pw5ugdJmTNkhrj8bBshYIDCZiU6137nRmX7sR6k0KENPpfDndkZ2Wc Tp8/Kb/M7gPhFy5g4NFKg4ovbYOwwGcFdkt/2VRSQtlycW1gx+U744C+T5CYO/+J 9U91d8mm12TdzOKGbvUllBTuPut8PCSg/Y/3SWCCt9+pTRhDTt7uK+ChuR11Cy6F TBs5hLT0X1dc5WD6GBXLwRJcK8yEue1uOnZ5NqKwb9G9EH28Ud/uaVe80HKY27+d /3IjHAUZ128vRXgMW+RlEhf3Jd5XUCy6xTzzgW8dhmttYfmfdPpNe6KP6LyKSi5E VZiff82haP78vWoYil+4RgTEnqNRTzmcWAMxSZQpsW1FolI5P3s/l3+ltrEpo8iC Kkn9s3M9Zv085PL0e5aTVn0Bz8PXP3KhxzsoUPwt+yT4mIIF/2QU9n+6ywx9RQoP ijeKj2rkbsy4XLDIZbFogpU1oRi59dUag38nhuguGQZ2dBR108z/H5+IFHDfDMjt 3kVLfBunRJ4VlYY7s608NVabAQtXrJP4huHz+NvViu0K/nbRE4RgihxC03l/RDcy UTeRGFTNJ/qXa/I1/753 =0WvP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----