From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E211381F3 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:10:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9AC4E0AED; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A675E0AA9 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phjr-macbookpro.local (adsl-75-36-170-224.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [75.36.170.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: phajdan.jr) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E79D33EB22 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <524AF3E0.202@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 09:10:08 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps References: <52489E6F.5080807@gentoo.org> <201309300054.42512.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <5248C268.5000305@gentoo.org> <106c82f3-8329-4237-adcd-bf84c1f05993@gentoo.org> <20131001161357.6f229d2a@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <20131001161357.6f229d2a@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mG33k0OOGAwOocPCqNmj3lq6hLH9vb9HE" X-Archives-Salt: c9fa659a-d69f-4891-bb74-24c105f717b9 X-Archives-Hash: af752f72135793b71907b74a4f50f03f This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --mG33k0OOGAwOocPCqNmj3lq6hLH9vb9HE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/1/13 7:13 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:14:29 +0200 > Agostino Sarubbo wrote: >> What do you think? > I think that when you set out to help every minor architecture get > stable, you didn't know what you were getting into. +1 I think it's great to see your work there, Agostino. If I can have a suggestion though, I'd much rather see x86 and amd64 being done with thorough testing and other arches mostly on as needed / best effort basis (which doesn't mean less testing but basically larger delays would be acceptable - or not keeping as many packages in the stable tree, not sure how many people actually use them). Pawe=C5=82 --mG33k0OOGAwOocPCqNmj3lq6hLH9vb9HE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlJK8+UACgkQuUQtlDBCeQL5QgCeLepJWCDKmlpRAwEnGQt2dori IHkAnAt4dClMPISvvpubDJ+SOq8p/vKM =gkI0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mG33k0OOGAwOocPCqNmj3lq6hLH9vb9HE--