From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HnxNU-0001Xi-5w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 13:47:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4FDjH2p011308; Tue, 15 May 2007 13:45:17 GMT Received: from aei-tech.com (static-69-95-200-80.ind.choiceone.net [69.95.200.80]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4FDfXbK005067 for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 13:41:34 GMT Received: (qmail 30434 invoked from network); 15 May 2007 09:41:33 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO www.aei-tech.com) (192.168.1.1) by 192.168.1.1 with SMTP; Tue, 15 May 2007 09:41:33 -0400 Received: from 192.168.2.155 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ctennis) by www.aei-tech.com with HTTP; Tue, 15 May 2007 09:41:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <52227.192.168.2.155.1179236493.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> In-Reply-To: <1179231162.29352.7.camel@localhost> References: <38928.192.168.2.155.1179228617.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <1179229251.29352.2.camel@localhost> <41798.192.168.2.155.1179229621.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <1179231162.29352.7.camel@localhost> Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 09:41:33 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing expat 2.0.0 From: "Caleb Tennis" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Archives-Salt: e79308d8-5163-49b8-9554-621f6003dcd7 X-Archives-Hash: c5cfdd5018f2116a6042a1a46a2de4e4 > Ok, I can't wait with GNOME-2.16.3 that long. I'm already late a month. > I wonder how much packages KDE needs rebuilt with the expat bump > (revdep-rebuild --library expat.so or something like that). Maybe > including it in the GNOME bumps is a good idea if that has it for more > packages than KDE. >>From my point of view, you're certainly welcome to do this sooner if you would like. I just wanted to get the ball rolling. I think the preserve_old_libs thing might just be the hack we need here. Caleb -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list