From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRc-0.12 is coming soon
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:14:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520E4FE4.9080606@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130816145735.GE16458@ns1.bonedaddy.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 16/08/13 10:57 AM, Todd Goodman wrote:
> * Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> [130816 10:43]:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Markos Chandras
>> <hwoarang@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few
>>> people lost their net configs
>>>
>>> So yep, ~arch being *this* broken is not so nice
>>
>> And hence the value of having a group of volunteer guinea pigs
>> (anybody running ~arch) is demonstrated. That said, masking big
>> changes and calling for volunteers among the volunteers doesn't
>> hurt.
>>
>> Seems like we need to be more careful with code that runs outside
>> the sandbox. Config protection is nice, but it is useless when
>> code runs outside the sandbox.
>>
>> Rich
>
> As one of those volunteer guinea pigs it all worked fine with the
> four ~x86 and three ~amd64 machines I've upgraded to
> openrc-0.12:0.
>
> They vary in when they were installed from 2005 up to a couple
> months ago and are generally updated daily.
>
> All ~x86 are "servers" (though most have X, KDE, and Gnome
> installed, they're only accessed remotely.)
>
> Two of the ~amd64 machines are "desktops" (though they both run
> services as "servers.")
>
> If I can help narrow anything down further I'm happy to help. Or
> to test anything.
>
For everyone's information -- The conf.d/net removal on upgrade is a
packaging issue, which could not have been tested prior to
openrc-0.12.ebuild hitting the tree. There are details in
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481336 if anyone's interested
in why it's happening.
I've fixed the 0.12.ebuild in the tree now. It's a hack but it seems
to be the best possible solution.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
iF4EAREIAAYFAlIOT+QACgkQ2ugaI38ACPB5cAD+KZaB/IOhTOQB90L5JEwPnBcO
eJzbFHOqtxeJAQ/i6pgBAKukByT2wFolArwBoNxjo6e+D+uVEw+Rct2KPL3cXM7t
=NhhK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-16 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-02 20:36 [gentoo-dev] OpenRc-0.12 is coming soon William Hubbs
[not found] ` <20130803070553.GA4801@comet.hsd1 .mn.comcast.net>
2013-08-03 7:05 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] " Donnie Berkholz
2013-08-03 10:03 ` Markos Chandras
2013-08-03 11:12 ` Douglas Freed
2013-08-03 11:43 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-03 13:07 ` Alan McKinnon
2013-08-03 15:28 ` William Hubbs
2013-08-03 16:37 ` Roy Bamford
2013-08-03 16:44 ` Duncan
2013-08-03 16:57 ` William Hubbs
2013-08-03 18:51 ` Sven Vermeulen
2013-08-03 19:51 ` Rich Freeman
[not found] ` < pan$3333f$9d197b5c$f94fdece$1b02b0d1@cox.net>
[not found] ` <20130803185102.GA24160@ gentoo.org>
2013-08-03 22:11 ` Duncan
[not found] ` <20130803165720.GA25920@ linux1>
2013-08-03 22:16 ` Duncan
2013-08-07 10:44 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-07 12:00 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-07 13:01 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-07 13:55 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-07 14:33 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-07 19:02 ` Peter Stuge
2013-08-07 21:59 ` Michał Górny
2013-08-07 19:01 ` Peter Stuge
2013-08-07 19:30 ` Tom Wijsman
[not found] ` <20130814084336.1c295d16@dartworks.biz>
2013-08-16 14:09 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] " Markos Chandras
2013-08-16 14:22 ` Fabio Erculiani
2013-08-16 14:42 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-16 14:57 ` Todd Goodman
2013-08-16 16:14 ` Ian Stakenvicius [this message]
2013-08-16 16:46 ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-16 22:25 ` Walter Dnes
2013-08-16 23:04 ` Dale
2013-08-17 2:33 ` Doug Goldstein
2013-08-17 3:30 ` Dale
2013-08-17 18:12 ` Doug Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520E4FE4.9080606@gentoo.org \
--to=axs@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox