public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRc-0.12 is coming soon
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:14:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <520E4FE4.9080606@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130816145735.GE16458@ns1.bonedaddy.net>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 16/08/13 10:57 AM, Todd Goodman wrote:
> * Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> [130816 10:43]:
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Markos Chandras
>> <hwoarang@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few
>>> people lost their net configs
>>> 
>>> So yep, ~arch being *this* broken is not so nice
>> 
>> And hence the value of having a group of volunteer guinea pigs 
>> (anybody running ~arch) is demonstrated.  That said, masking big 
>> changes and calling for volunteers among the volunteers doesn't
>> hurt.
>> 
>> Seems like we need to be more careful with code that runs outside
>> the sandbox.  Config protection is nice, but it is useless when
>> code runs outside the sandbox.
>> 
>> Rich
> 
> As one of those volunteer guinea pigs it all worked fine with the
> four ~x86 and three ~amd64 machines I've upgraded to
> openrc-0.12:0.
> 
> They vary in when they were installed from 2005 up to a couple
> months ago and are generally updated daily.
> 
> All ~x86 are "servers" (though most have X, KDE, and Gnome
> installed, they're only accessed remotely.)
> 
> Two of the ~amd64 machines are "desktops" (though they both run
> services as "servers.")
> 
> If I can help narrow anything down further I'm happy to help.  Or
> to test anything.
> 

For everyone's information -- The conf.d/net removal on upgrade is a
packaging issue, which could not have been tested prior to
openrc-0.12.ebuild hitting the tree.  There are details in
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481336 if anyone's interested
in why it's happening.

I've fixed the 0.12.ebuild in the tree now.  It's a hack but it seems
to be the best possible solution.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAlIOT+QACgkQ2ugaI38ACPB5cAD+KZaB/IOhTOQB90L5JEwPnBcO
eJzbFHOqtxeJAQ/i6pgBAKukByT2wFolArwBoNxjo6e+D+uVEw+Rct2KPL3cXM7t
=NhhK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-16 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-02 20:36 [gentoo-dev] OpenRc-0.12 is coming soon William Hubbs
     [not found] ` <20130803070553.GA4801@comet.hsd1 .mn.comcast.net>
2013-08-03  7:05 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] " Donnie Berkholz
2013-08-03 10:03   ` Markos Chandras
2013-08-03 11:12     ` Douglas Freed
2013-08-03 11:43     ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-03 13:07       ` Alan McKinnon
2013-08-03 15:28     ` William Hubbs
2013-08-03 16:37       ` Roy Bamford
2013-08-03 16:44       ` Duncan
2013-08-03 16:57         ` William Hubbs
2013-08-03 18:51         ` Sven Vermeulen
2013-08-03 19:51       ` Rich Freeman
     [not found]       ` < pan$3333f$9d197b5c$f94fdece$1b02b0d1@cox.net>
     [not found]         ` <20130803185102.GA24160@ gentoo.org>
2013-08-03 22:11           ` Duncan
     [not found]         ` <20130803165720.GA25920@ linux1>
2013-08-03 22:16           ` Duncan
2013-08-07 10:44       ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-07 12:00         ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-07 13:01           ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-07 13:55             ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-07 14:33               ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-07 19:02             ` Peter Stuge
2013-08-07 21:59               ` Michał Górny
2013-08-07 19:01         ` Peter Stuge
2013-08-07 19:30           ` Tom Wijsman
     [not found] ` <20130814084336.1c295d16@dartworks.biz>
2013-08-16 14:09   ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] " Markos Chandras
2013-08-16 14:22     ` Fabio Erculiani
2013-08-16 14:42     ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-16 14:57       ` Todd Goodman
2013-08-16 16:14         ` Ian Stakenvicius [this message]
2013-08-16 16:46           ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-16 22:25             ` Walter Dnes
2013-08-16 23:04               ` Dale
2013-08-17  2:33             ` Doug Goldstein
2013-08-17  3:30               ` Dale
2013-08-17 18:12                 ` Doug Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=520E4FE4.9080606@gentoo.org \
    --to=axs@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox