From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA411381F3 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 545FBE0CC2; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85D7BE0B88 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [124.78.108.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: patrick) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC09633EBA1 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:33:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5204D4DC.30108@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:39:08 +0800 From: Patrick Lauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130426 Thunderbird/17.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8 References: <5203A880.1050306@gentoo.org> <5203B190.80306@gentoo.org> <20130808172340.7d2424af@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <5203C908.1000304@gentoo.org> <20130808185357.4208db83@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130808202627.4b474471@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130809020303.GA11215@linux1> <1376033807.30224.21.camel@kanae> <5204B6A9.1080309@gentoo.org> <5204D30A.703@gentoo.org> <20130809132622.70e67d5c@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: <20130809132622.70e67d5c@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 0b8aaee8-be57-4504-a838-e7d2c0f95307 X-Archives-Hash: 67d4e050a3cdf6a1b599ffac31595d16 On 08/09/2013 07:26 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:31:22 +0800 > Patrick Lauer wrote: > >> You just removed the upgrade path for users. > > The upgrade path is to install systemd or to implement openrc support. > Invalid upgrade path. "The upgrade path is to install Fedora" is about as reasonable, and also not acceptable.