From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2361381F3 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C832BE0AFA; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE3ABE0AE1 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [124.78.108.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: patrick) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B98F33EB37 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5204D30A.703@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:31:22 +0800 From: Patrick Lauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130426 Thunderbird/17.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8 References: <5203A880.1050306@gentoo.org> <5203B190.80306@gentoo.org> <20130808172340.7d2424af@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <5203C908.1000304@gentoo.org> <20130808185357.4208db83@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130808202627.4b474471@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130809020303.GA11215@linux1> <1376033807.30224.21.camel@kanae> <5204B6A9.1080309@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 3dcf7812-7c2f-4229-8e7f-5b747760a379 X-Archives-Hash: f5a5aba1d2eabcd87068dcd65bc53e95 On 08/09/2013 06:27 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:30 AM, hasufell wrote: >> On 08/09/2013 09:36 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: >>> It is not a regression if a new version of gnome mrequires systemd >>> and does not work with OpenRc; it is a design choice. >> >> We are not just talking about random ebuild features here that have been >> dropped. It's a MAJOR feature. And it _matters_ for gentoo. So it IS a >> _regression_. > > How does not supporting OpenRC matter for Gentoo? Gentoo isn't > OpenRC. OpenRC is just one init system that Gentoo supports. You can > run Gentoo without it - indeed you can run Gentoo without any init at > all (via Prefix). You just removed the upgrade path for users. If that's not a regression ... well ... err ... Somehow I get really confused by this selective perception (anyone remembering the KDE overlay getting paludised and the fallout from that?)