From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF371381F3 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 07:29:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20087E0C29; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 07:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F580E0C21 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 07:28:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.182.101.20] (85-76-106-192-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.106.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8617D33EBC0 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 07:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <520499B7.8060808@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:26:47 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130802 Thunderbird/17.0.7 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [typo] Re: Re: Multiple implementations shouldn't block Gentoo's progress. References: <5203DEA5.30004@gentoo.org> <20130808204701.3b419e58@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130808211103.4069d7ff@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <5204403D.8050209@gentoo.org> <52048088.8020400@gentoo.org> <20130809064224.GA8940@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <20130809065115.GB8940@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <20130809071934.GA11821@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20130809071934.GA11821@linux1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 64cd7c81-bb02-4d48-b29d-85e83dace347 X-Archives-Hash: 8582664ca5e98394230510f1bc770483 On 09/08/13 10:19, William Hubbs wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 07:51:15AM +0100, Steven J. Long wrote: >> wrote: >>> It would seem to make sense if the packages are unmasked conditionally >> s/ conditionally// >> >>> in the parent, or the linux profile, and then unmasked in the profiles >>> that need them. Sorry if I'm misunderstanding. > > What needs to be masked though? Like I said in my > message earlier in this thread, there is no need for any major > acrobatics here. If you upgrade to gnome-3.8, you switch over to systemd. > The gnome team is working on an upgrade guide, so let's leave that to > them. :-) > > William > For example, gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon could be p.mask in non-systemd profiles instructing the users to switch to the systemd profile and point to the guide you were referring to As in, the benefit would be informative mask message