From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23DE01381F3 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EE72E087D; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:47:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49920E084A for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jmac.jlec.de (ip-62-143-30-40.unitymediagroup.de [62.143.30.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jlec) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06C1F33E874; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 14:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51EBF453.7030500@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 16:46:43 +0200 From: justin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook References: <20337.28987.736877.961717@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120327154239.GA17394@gentoo.org> <1332870540.18466.9.camel@belkin4> <20120327180158.GA1468@siphos.be> <1332873243.11827.15.camel@rook> <20120327200532.GA15040@thinkpad.rutgers.edu> <1333094778.1407.9.camel@belkin4> <20120331084402.GA23183@gentoo.org> <1333200867.29219.2.camel@belkin4> <4F77421A.9030306@gentoo.org> <20120331232508.GA18617@waltdnes.org> <4F77A269.1070203@gentoo.org> <1374406937.23081.58.camel@localhost> <51EBEF8E.4090603@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <51EBEF8E.4090603@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2SXCQJTMWNGXEDAWCNPLW" X-Archives-Salt: 96ecb53a-6fe7-45da-9ff1-ddfa7feddf73 X-Archives-Hash: cb705f6331e5eaa90087235c82fcd86d This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2SXCQJTMWNGXEDAWCNPLW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 7/21/13 4:26 PM, Michael Weber wrote: > On 07/21/2013 01:42 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> Would be possible to generate and provide squashed files at the >> same time tarballs with portage tree snapshots are generated? >> mksquashfs can take a lot of resources depending on the machine, >> but providing the squashed images would still benefit people >> allowing them to download and mount them >=20 > I've establish a cron job on my server to generate gzip and xz > squashed snapshots. I sync distfiles from utwente at 6:05 and generate > the squashfs at 6:35 after verifying the gpg signatures. > There's a 10,5h lag between snapshots and squashfs files - we could > improve if I'm allowed to sync against master rsync/dinstfiles. >=20 > [1] http://lore.xmw.de/gentoo/genberry/snapshots/ >=20 >=20 I am creating them as well. Perhaps we can bundle the effort. What I also found out that using zsync is quite efficient with squashfs images. I normally don't sync more then 20-30% of the image. Justin ------enig2SXCQJTMWNGXEDAWCNPLW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlHr9FoACgkQgAnW8HDreRa3NQCfYYliqcTfGF31FltQhefknLEd Sr8An3FFj0eNP+bBi/ImgzxYeVr7G61r =J+kZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2SXCQJTMWNGXEDAWCNPLW--